Thursday, July 07, 2005

Kennewick Man

I've been following this story off-and-on since the 1998 discovery of 9300-year-old remains near Kennewick, Washington. I was taking an Anthropology class at the time (where I first met my Annie), so my interest in the story was heightened somewhat. The more I learned, the more outraged I became. The bones were found by accident on land owned by the Army Corps of Engineers. When the remains were dated and measured, scientists were shocked and excited at their discovery: the bones were more than 9000 years old. No big deal right? Well, this is where it gets interesting. The bones appear to be from a Caucasian male rather than from an Asiatic (Native American) one. (I'm not going to get into how they do all these technical measurements on the skull structure). This discovery, if proven to be accurate, would throw out much of our long-held beliefs about where the first Americans came from and when they came here.

The scientists, naturally, planned to excavate the entire site in order to look for other possible human remains or cultural artifacts. But, this is where the story gets outrageous. The Army Corps of Engineers forbade further excavation and promptly planted over the site. What's more, Native American tribes got involved and demanded the remains be handed over to them for proper burial. They claimed Kennewick Man was not an ancient white man, but one of their own. To paraphrase one of the tribal spokespeople: "We know this is true because our people have always been here. Our ancestors have passed down our story to us." Thus began the protracted legal battle you now read about in the article.

My outrage stems from the willingness of some to forbid scientific study in the name of religion, culture, history, ancestory, or pride. If you are truly secure in your ancestoral pride, you would let the light of careful scientific scrutiny shine on anything and everything. It would appear that scientists may finally be able to shine that light on Kennewick Man. Unfortunately, the tribes have shown that they don't just "want a seat at the table." In this, and any future cases, they want to bury the remains with no scientific study performed, and they want the Government and the scientific community to go away. If the pending legislation in Congress should pass, they just might get what they want.

4 Comments:

At 11:36 PM, Blogger Shantell Brightman said...

THIS IS A TRIVIA OPPORTUNITY!!! WINK, WINK...HINT...HINT......

 
At 8:49 AM, Blogger John said...

Over pride? Absolutely. The others present thornier issues, of course. My beef is in someone just completely refusing to cooperate or compromise at all. In this case we're talking about bones that have been in the ground for over 9000 years. I don't believe an oral history stating something like "We have always been here because we know we have" is good enough. And, I think our scientific community owes it to us (for lack of a better phrase) to do what they can to help us understand more about who we are and how we got here. So, to answer your question, yes, in this case. I would have to address others on a case-by-case basis! :)

 
At 9:02 AM, Blogger geofreak said...

My personal belief is "Truth" above all. Finding out the origins of Kennewick man will only add another peice to a giant puzzle.

 
At 4:38 PM, Blogger mkfreeberg said...

If the bones were tested thoroughly and confirmed to be a) verifiably 9300 years old, and b) caucasian, take a good look at what this would have meant.

It would have had confounding implications for all the native-american communities, everywhere, because it would shake to the core their collective claim of being "native". Either they had grown in to replace a previously extinct, but older, tribe of caucasians, or some of the native-american tribes had taken this land from an older indigenous race by conquest.

That would undermine the logical justification for any & all special privileges they ever acquired from our government, whether those privileges were delivered, or simply promised (and then welched on). It would be pretty weak to say "you owe us, because you took this land from us after we stole it from someone else fair & square".

I see the link appears to have expired. Here is a newer one.

http://www.washington.edu/burkemuseum/kman/default.htm

 

Post a Comment

<< Home